Move routine cases out of the reviewer queue.

Cenrus finds the relevant payer adjudication, compares it with the provider request, and tells reviewers which cases require investigation.

Review queue

Consistent with payerRoutine path
Amount discrepancyReviewer
Ambiguous matchReviewer
Claim not adjudicatedWait

Every bill receives the same manual first pass.

Reviewers spend time reconstructing the financial state before they know whether a case is routine or complex.

  1. 01

    Identify the insurance plan

  2. 02

    Find the relevant claim

  3. 03

    Read the EOB

  4. 04

    Interpret payer adjudication

  5. 05

    Match the claim to the bill

  6. 06

    Compare each financial value

  7. 07

    Decide whether to investigate

  8. 08

    Start the investigation

The first seven steps find and interpret evidence. Cenrus performs this work before the reviewer opens the case.

Give each case the right path from the start.

Cenrus connects patient-authorized payer data with the bill and any available payment evidence.

01

Connect payer access

The patient authorizes the payer connection. Cenrus synchronizes the available claim and EOB records.

02

Send the provider bill

The customer provides the bill and any account or payment context already available in its workflow.

03

Reconcile the records

Cenrus matches the claim, rebuilds the payer allocation, and compares the provider request.

04

Route the result

Routine cases receive a classification. Exceptions arrive with the relevant evidence assembled.

Scenario model

Queue transformation

Set your operating assumptions to estimate how much routine first-pass work leaves the manual queue.

Your assumptions

Bills entering the current review queue

Reviewer time spent before deeper review

Share of bills with enough payer evidence to assess

Share of reconcilable bills classified as routine

Hourly labor cost used for this estimate

Reconcilable bills

1,800

With usable payer data

First pass removed

1,224

49% of the queue

Queue remaining

1,276

Exceptions and data gaps

Reviewer hours returned

163.2

Estimated each month

Monthly queue

Every bill starts in the manual first pass.

2,500 bills

Routine first pass removed1,224 bills
Exceptions prepared for review576 bills
Usable payer data unavailable700 bills

Estimated monthly labor value

$8,486

Modeled monthly labor value based on the assumptions above.

Calculation

2,500 bills × 72% usable data × 68% routine
= 1,224 first passes removed

1,224 × 8 min ÷ 60 × $52/hr
= $8,486 estimated value

Automate routine classification. Prepare the exceptions.

The first verdict set stays narrow so each result maps to a clear review action.

Consistent with payer

The provider request agrees with payer adjudication based on the records and match evidence available.

Amount discrepancy

The requested amount differs from the payer assigned responsibility or financial allocation.

Claim not found

The available payer records do not contain a supported match for the provider request.

Claim not adjudicated

A related claim exists, but the payer has not completed the financial decision.

Ambiguous match

More than one candidate or conflicting signals prevent a reliable association.

Human review required

An evidence gap or customer rule sends the case directly to a reviewer.