01
Connect payer access
The patient authorizes the payer connection. Cenrus synchronizes the available claim and EOB records.
Cenrus finds the relevant payer adjudication, compares it with the provider request, and tells reviewers which cases require investigation.
Review queue
Reviewers spend time reconstructing the financial state before they know whether a case is routine or complex.
Identify the insurance plan
Find the relevant claim
Read the EOB
Interpret payer adjudication
Match the claim to the bill
Compare each financial value
Decide whether to investigate
Start the investigation
The first seven steps find and interpret evidence. Cenrus performs this work before the reviewer opens the case.
Cenrus connects patient-authorized payer data with the bill and any available payment evidence.
01
The patient authorizes the payer connection. Cenrus synchronizes the available claim and EOB records.
02
The customer provides the bill and any account or payment context already available in its workflow.
03
Cenrus matches the claim, rebuilds the payer allocation, and compares the provider request.
04
Routine cases receive a classification. Exceptions arrive with the relevant evidence assembled.
Scenario model
Set your operating assumptions to estimate how much routine first-pass work leaves the manual queue.
Bills entering the current review queue
Reviewer time spent before deeper review
Share of bills with enough payer evidence to assess
Share of reconcilable bills classified as routine
Hourly labor cost used for this estimate
Reconcilable bills
1,800
With usable payer data
First pass removed
1,224
49% of the queue
Queue remaining
1,276
Exceptions and data gaps
Reviewer hours returned
163.2
Estimated each month
Monthly queue
Every bill starts in the manual first pass.
2,500 bills
Estimated monthly labor value
$8,486
Modeled monthly labor value based on the assumptions above.
Calculation
2,500 bills × 72% usable data × 68% routine
= 1,224 first passes removed
1,224 × 8 min ÷ 60 × $52/hr
= $8,486 estimated value
The first verdict set stays narrow so each result maps to a clear review action.
The provider request agrees with payer adjudication based on the records and match evidence available.
The requested amount differs from the payer assigned responsibility or financial allocation.
The available payer records do not contain a supported match for the provider request.
A related claim exists, but the payer has not completed the financial decision.
More than one candidate or conflicting signals prevent a reliable association.
An evidence gap or customer rule sends the case directly to a reviewer.